From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Sep 28 18:51:25 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id SAA34974;
	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:51:25 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA34969
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:51:24 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8S9qcA00717;
	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 02:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com)
Message-Id: <200009280952.e8S9qcA00717@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: Takanori Watanabe <takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
cc: Munehiro Matsuda <haro@tk.kubota.co.jp>, current@freebsd.org,
        acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:38:57 +0900."
             <200009280438.NAA63726@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 02:52:38 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 679
Subject: [acpi-jp 679] Re: My system hang with ACPI kernel thread 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org

> 
> >With the addition of ACPI kernel thread, my system hangs in about 
> >10 miniutes use after boot up. By disabling kernel thread, system
> >runs just fine.
> >
> >Do you have any idea where to look at?
> >I'll try and see what I can do myself.
> 
> Please set debug.aml_debug and debug.acpi_debug to 1 and 
> see what will happen.

It wouldn't surprise me if the system wasn't running out of kernel 
memory.  Right now we just keep mallocing storage to queue ACPI events 
(bad idea).  The entire event/Notify stuff needs to be somewhat rethought 
(eg. I think we need an event filter).

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


