From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Fri Sep 29 22:41:46 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id WAA37925;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:46 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp (tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp [202.239.16.2])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA37918;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:45 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from tshiozak@astec.co.jp)
Received: from mushroom.astec.co.jp (mushroom.astec.co.jp [172.20.10.50])
	by tokyonet-entrance.astec.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W2000/09/18) with ESMTP id WAA00135;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:39 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (tengu.astec.co.jp [172.20.26.39])
	by mushroom.astec.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-astec-mushroom1.0) with ESMTP id WAA18531;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:38 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20000929.224139.70178011.tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org
Cc: msmith@freebsd.org, haro@tk.kubota.co.jp,
        takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp, current@freebsd.org
From: "T.SHIOZAKI" <tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20000929220517P.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
References: <200009290916.e8T9GmA04415@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
	<20000929220517P.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b37 on Emacs 20.6 / Mule 4.1 (AOI)
X-My-Status: SuperAoiMoe
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 692
Subject: [acpi-jp 692] Re: ACPI megapatch
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: tshiozak@astec.co.jp


From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
Subject: [acpi-jp 691] Re: ACPI megapatch
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:05:17 +0900
Message-ID: <20000929220517P.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>

> > Issues outstanding:
> >  - Need to remove superfluous headers
> >  - Need to decide the correct split between <sys/acpi.h> and 
> >    <sys/dev/acpi/acpi.h> in terms of functionality.
> I'd like to move and rename them as I said in my previous mail,
> <sys/acpi.h> -> <sys/dev/acpi/acpi.h>
> 	shared by both kernel and userland programs
> <sys/dev/acpi/acpi.h> -> <sys/dev/acpi/acpivar.h>
> 	shared within kernel code (acpi stuff and related drivers)

IMHO, it's desirable to use the name "acpi.h", because of conflict
with the file dumped by /usr/sbin/config.

I love :
  fooreg.h : device dependent and implementation independent
             structures, macros, and others.
  foovar.h : implementation dependent ones.


--
Takuya SHIOZAKI

