From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Oct 17 13:40:05 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id NAA76947;
	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:40:05 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (fmfdns02.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA76936
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:40:04 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from andrew.grover@intel.com)
Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv043-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.48.128])
	by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.44 2001/10/01 19:10:43 root Exp $) with SMTP id EAA22262
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 04:40:02 GMT
Received: from FMSMSX017.fm.intel.com ([132.233.42.196])
 by fmsmsxvs043.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.6) with SMTP id M2001101621391924843
 for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:39:19 -0700
Received: by fmsmsx017.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <VBAY0M8C>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:38:11 -0700
Message-ID: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C42D675@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
From: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
To: "'acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org'" <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>
Cc: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:40:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1350
Subject: [acpi-jp 1350] RE: acpica-unix-20010920 and porting to NetBSD
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: andrew.grover@intel.com

> From: Mike Smith [mailto:msmith@freebsd.org]
> Andy & co. at Intel - could you please consider, again, supporting the 
> "implicit return" feature, even if you just make it a build-time option?

I've copied Bob in case he wants to respond, but I think we're still saying
no.

> Too many systems out there depend on it for correct functioning. 8(

Toshibas, of course. Out of curiosity, who else?

Regards -- Andy
