From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Oct 24 16:40:36 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id QAA63049;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:36 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA63038;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:33 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f9O7qoI08608;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200110240752.f9O7qoI08608@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, ache@nagual.pp.ru,
        current@FreeBSD.org, acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:41:06 +0300."
             <3BD52D22.D8F3C3A1@FreeBSD.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:52:50 -0700
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1362
Subject: [acpi-jp 1362] Re: ACPI: problem with fdc resource allocation 
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: msmith@freebsd.org

> > The problem is still here as of today's kernel. Please do
> > something about it.
> 
> Should I reapeat how sad it is that this longstanding
> problem is being completely ignored by the acpi
> maintainer(s)?

No, I'd prefer that you found something constructive to do with your time.
I'm not interested in being bitched out over something as trivial as this 
when I have so much on my plate already; if you can't contribute, do me 
the least favour and save me the angst.

Thanks.
Mike

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E


