From owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Mon Oct 29 01:56:07 2001
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id BAA28167;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:56:07 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (root@tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA28162
	for <acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:56:05 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (iwasaki.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.92])
	(authenticated as iwa with CRAM-MD5)
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6/tasogare) with ESMTP/inet id f9SGu3m92919;
	Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:56:03 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 01:55:58 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20011029.015558.74754050.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011028083502.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200110280954.SAA64162@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp>
	<XFMail.011028083502.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+010328
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1392
Subject: [acpi-jp 1392] Re: Libretto L2
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org

Hi, John!

> > Remove WITNESS option then try and tell the result, please.
> 
> Heh, no.  The sched_lock patch is quite wrong here.  That doesn't block context
> switches.  Does anyone have the original panic message?  Also, is this similar

Here it is;
http://home.jp.FreeBSD.ORG/cgi-bin/showmail/acpi-jp/1348
http://home.jp.FreeBSD.ORG/cgi-bin/showmail/raw/acpi-jp/1348

That is double fault, so very difficult to debug...

Now I'm trying to find when this panic happend.  At least my toshiba
portege 3110CT could sleep/wakeup with ACPI kernel as of 20010907.

20011027        NG
20010907        OK
20011007        NG
20010921        NG
20010914        NG
20010910        testing

> to my post to -current regarding a NULL pointer dereference in teh ATA code at
> a FREE() statement on resume?
> 
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=385431+0+archive/2001/freebsd-curre
> nt/20011021.freebsd-current
> 
> There seem to be some bugs related to ata resuming multiple times.  Perhaps
> that is ACPI's fault for doing multiple DEVICE_RESUME()'s somehow?

I'll try this too later...

Thanks
