From owner-ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Aug 28 08:08:10 1997
Received: by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.7+2.7Wbeta7/8.7.3) id IAA07787
	Thu, 28 Aug 1997 08:08:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.7+2.7Wbeta7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA07749
	for <ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 08:08:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.6/8.7.3) id QAA01317; Wed, 27 Aug 1997 16:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 16:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708272307.QAA01317@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Reply-To: ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=20]
X-Sequence: ports-jp 1603
Subject: [ports-jp 1603] [me@gw.muc.ditec.de: XEmacs 20.2 port candidate]
Errors-To: owner-ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-ports-jp@jp.freebsd.org

$B$@$=$&$G$9!#6M;3BbD9!"$$$+$,$G$7$g$&!#(B

MuLE$B!JB>9q8l2=3HD%!K$K$D$$$F$O(B xemacs20$B$H(B xemacs20-mule$B$H$G$b%G%#%l%/(B
$B%H%j$rJ,$1$F!J$G6M;3BbD9$NF@0U5;$G$"$k(B .include .../Makefile$B$G%U%!%$%k(B
$B$r6&MQ$7$F!K!"$H$$$&$N$G$$$$$H;W$$$^$9!#(B

$B$"$5$_(B

$B#P(B.$B#S(B. $B$=$&$$$($PED2,$5$s$,$D$/$C$F$$$i$C$7$c$C$?B>?t$N(B mule$B%]!<%H$H$$(B
       $B$&$N$O$I$&$J$C$?$s$G$7$?$C$1!)(B send-pr$B$O$5$l$F$$$J$$$h$&$G$9$,(B...$B!#(B
------
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 14:22:17 +0200
From: Michael Elbel <me@gw.muc.ditec.de>
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: XEmacs 20.2 port candidate

I've made a port for XEmacs 20.2, that could become editors/xemacs-20 if
people are happy. I've so far checked that everything I use it for
works properly. I cannot, however, test the MULE featueres properly,
or, at all :(

So, I'm asking the fellow multiliguistic people here: Would folks who are
interested in the MULE version of xemacs please check out the port
that I've put at:

	ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/xemacs-20.2.port.tgz

For now I've made it so that MULE *isn't* compiled in as default
for the sake of the perceived majority of folks who'll simply say
make and not need MULE and the speed penalty. 
If you want it, you'll have to set the environment variable WITH_MULE to 
something. 
I'm open to suggestion about how to handle this better/different/more 
uniform with other ports.

Thanks ahead,

Michael

-- 
Michael Elbel, DITEC Internet Services, Muenchen, Germany - me@muc.ditec.de
Fermentation fault (coors dumped)


